Backlighting Devil’s Club Overhead

Devils club leaves photographed by Lorelle VanFossen backlit in the forest.

Traveling to Seattle, a friend and I went to the John Bastyr School for one of their health and herbal festivals. A nature walk through the forest next to the campus intrigued me. It was incredibly informative, discussing how to use plants in the wilderness for medical treatments and health.

The Pacific Northwest forest was dappled with sunlight and the treacherous Devils Club hung over our heads at one point in trail. I worked around the group trying to get a good angle on the plant to capture the details with the strong backlighting.

The Devil’s Club is one that I’ve run into since a child digging around the forests of the Pacific Northwest, and trust me, this is one you do not want to stumble into. Called the Devil’s Club or Walking Stick, it can grow up to 16 feet (5 meters) tall in rainforests and damp environments to which Western Washington is well equipped. Spines are found not only on the stems but the leaves, making it a painful experience to touch in any way, even brush against.

According to our guide, Native Americans used Devil’s Club for medicine to treat diabetes, tumors, chapped lips, and tumors. It can also be used as an analgesic, though it isn’t as strong as traditional aspirin. It can be used in herbal teas and he said that they ate it as food. He didn’t clarify which part they ate, from the red fruits that form in clusters off stems that look like clubs, or from the leaves or root.

For me, this is a plant I’ve endured most of my life, having spent too many hours pulling its little thorn-like spines from by arms and legs and out of my dogs. Still, it is a magnificent examples of the unusual in the world. A plant I think of when I imagine what plant life was like during the dinosaur times.

Photographing the Moon Eclipse 2008

Featured

Time laspe images of the moon eclipsing the sun in 2008, photography by Lorelle VanFossen.

It was freezing cold outside. And dark. Not the kind of dark that just comes with night but the dark that happens when the earth passes between the sun and the moon.

It was February 20, 2008, and I was in our new temporary home in Gaston, Oregon, an hour west of Portland, in time for the total eclipse of the moon. Brent and I stood in the cold for hours to photograph and watch this rare event.

NASA explained that the difference between this eclipse and other annual eclipses is that this one was first visible to the majority of people on the planet, covering the Americans, Europe, Africa, and western Asia. The full eclipse happens only when there is a full moon and only if the moon passes through some portion of Earth’s shadow, when the earth, sun, and moon are in total alignment.

We are used to seeing solar eclipses, where the moon blocks the sun for a few minutes. A lunar eclipse lasts for hours as the earth blocks the light hitting the moon. No special glasses are required for a lunar eclipse, unlike a solar eclipse. The previous total or full lunar eclipse was three years before. The next one is April 15, 2014.

There are two shadows that the earth cats on the moon, an inner an outer shadow. It is the inner shadow, the umbra, that happens when earth blocks all direct sunlight from reaching the moon, making it totally dark. If the moon passes through the umbra, it is a partial eclipse. If the moon passes through both the umbral (outer shadow), then a total eclipse occurs. We were in for a total eclipse.

As the moon passes through the various stages of the eclipse, it turns from red to dark brown and dark gray. That is what we experienced.

For us, it was a rare enough event as clouds didn’t interfere with the show. Continue reading

Cherry Tree Blossoms, Seattle Arboretum

Cherry Blossoms, photograph by Lorelle VanFossen

The Seattle Arboretum is a glorious place to wander year around, but in the spring, the rows and rows of flowering trees are wonders to behold.

I often led many nature photography tours in and around Seattle’s most famous park, a long green belt that starts near the University of Washington and Museum of History and Industry, along the ship canals between Lake Union and Lake Washington, and runs for 230 acres along the Lake Washington waterfront, all the way to Madison Park area.

This was taken many years ago during one of the first photo excursions I led to the Arboretum. I had set up my camera for the participants and students to see how they could control the background by using the blossoms of the tree itself to frame the petals of interest, creating a blur of pastels. Along the way, I snapped a few pictures as teaching slides, but this particular one fascinated me.

This image has been used on book covers, posters, note cards, and just as artwork in addition to it holding a special place in many of my photography workshops and classes. It makes a great teaching point, but it is also just lovely to look at.

Just reminds me that you never know when you press the shutter, what the future of that image will bring.

Photographing Hands

hands working with lavender wands photograph by Lorelle VanFossen

I love photographing hands. I should dig through my collection and do a gallery post of nothing but hands.

While old sages say eyes are the windows to the soul, I think hands speak even louder about a life lived.

My own are covered with memories, scars from injuries, adventures, and risks survived. I’ve long been a lover of cats and rescued many, some of which came with attitudes and claws, leaving their marks on my light sensitive skin.

Hands tell of the kind of work a person does, whether for money or passion. I love the hands of painters, potters, and other hand-crafters as they are often stained and calloused with the efforts of their work. Many blue collar workers have soft hands today as their work is not very labor-intensive. It makes me miss the hands of my family members who worked the fields, build their own homes, and stayed closely tied to the land through their hands.

Photographing hands can be easy, but take care to pay close attention to the background and foreground to ensure there is nothing distracting from the hands. Zoom in as close as the composition can permit so we see the details.

orangatan hands, mother and child, photograph by Lorelle VanFossenWatch for the lighting. Side lighting works best to bring out the cracks and lines. Soft, diffused light is best for younger hands.

In the two examples of hands I have here, the first one is of an older woman helping a young girl make a lavender wand at the Lavender Festival, Washington County, Oregon. Not composed, just a chance shot, I like the comparison of the different aged hands, and the idea of helping hands. I was photographing under a huge tent, so the bright summer sunlight was diffused, giving me an even light across their hands. Their silver jewelry just adds a touch of familiarity.

The second is of a mother and child orangutang in a group I worked with in St. Petersburg Zoo in Western Florida. I loved their hands, holding on as much as possible, and the anthropomorphic emotions that arise accordingly. It was a stormy day with the light bright and shadowed intermittently. I had my heavy camera on a stable tripod and worked with a long lens to fill the frame with their hands, then waiting for the light to shift, hoping they wouldn’t also shift in the process. If you would like to see more from our work at the zoo, see Funny Faces in our gallery.

For more help on photographing hands, see:

The Beautification of a Danelion

dandelion with purple foreground from another flower blurred, photograph by Brent VanFossen

In our series on Background Magic, we talk about how to do this, to blur the foreground of your subject by holding a leaf or flower petal in front of it, close to the camera lens. It becomes a blur, almost a transparent wash of color around the subject.

Brent and I were photographing wild flowers on an island in the Puget Sound San Juans, experimenting with many different effects when we took this. Dandelions are everywhere in the Puget Sound area, dotting the landscape with their tight yellow heads which turn into white golf balls when they go to seed in the late summer. We challenged each other to photograph “boring” flowers in new ways and Brent came up with this winner.

Lavender Festival: Photographing People and Hats

Women artist dressed up for the Lavender Festival, photography by Lorelle VanFossen

When I photograph people and I don’t have time for signing model releases, I take care to hide their faces. This beautiful woman, an artist selling her wares at the Lavender Festival, Washington County, Oregon, turned her head away to reveal the lovely hat she was wearing, which was what I really wanted to capture in the first place.

I love hats, and I love people who wear hats. They are not easy to photograph, both the hats and the people who wear them. If you catch them from the front, most of the time their faces are shaded and the camera can’t handle the contrast between the brightness of the fore and background and the darkness of the shade under the hat. Photographing them from the side helps, but you have to watch for extreme dark and light areas.

Photographing from the back is perfect as you get the hat on the person without the worry of over or underexposure issues. If that is the story, then you’ve aced it.

This woman was dressed so perfectly for the event and her lavender artwork in a beautiful antique dress and this magnificent hat with the huge flowers and ribbons. If I’d had more time, I would have asked her to pose for me, had her sign the model’s agreement, and spent a lot more time arranging her with her artwork. Unfortunately, we were on the run. Maybe next year.

A Reflection of Trees

trees and garden in pond reflection, bellingrath, alabama, by lorelle vanfossen

A select few artists and photographers specialized in working with reflections, images captured in lakes, rivers, ponds, and puddles, then turning them upside for display, making what would normally be seen upside down be right side up, a portrait of abstract Monet-style photography.

This particular image I took in spring at the Bellingrath Plantation and Gardens, along one of the many ponds and estuaries of the slough coming off the Gulf Coast and mixing into the fresh waters of the Dog River and other waterways around Mobile, Alabama.

I loved the stark trees in the water, the blue sky, the flowering azaleas, all came together for a powerful reflection image. I underexposed a bit, playing around with capturing the darker tones of the image, and this was the best of the lot.

Rows of Tulips – Skagit Valley Tulip Festival

Skagit Valley Tulip Festival rows of pink and yellow, photograph by Lorelle VanFossen

Rows of tulips at the Skagit Valley Tulip Festival.

There were several intriguing things about this composition that compelled me to take it.

First, the leading rows moving into the distance towards the cars. Then the cars at the end of the line. It’s like a strange parking lot in the flowers.

Second, the building and mounds of compost in the background. They echo each other and look like mountains, which would be in the distance if the overcast sky permitted.

I like the lines, the rows, curves of the cars, then triangles of the building and mounds. It’s a busy image, but somehow, it still appeals to me.

The Bridge Over La Conner, Washington

Bridge over La Conner, Washington, by Lorelle VanFossen

I’m a little uncomfortable sharing this photograph. My cousin, Don Lee, looks at this view daily. It’s his favorite in the world, right outside his home in La Conner, Washington. Helping him with his photography, I encouraged him to photograph it every day as a photo montage for a year. If you sat only a few minutes with him you would completely understand why I gave him the assignment as he speaks about the bridge, the river below, the town beyond, and Mt. Baker beyond that, like it’s a personal and intimate friend, with mood swings and attitude.

We were having a discussion about this very scene when the stormy weather shifted and the setting sun burst through with golden rays, turning the bridge the most brilliant shade of orange. I grabbed my camera and the two of us photographed this monument to man’s power to defy a river.

Don, I know my picture is humble. Your work is phenomenal and someday I hope you exhibit the entire year’s worth of pictures of the bridge across the channel to La Conner.

Azaleas in Bloom, Bellingrath Plantation, Alabama

Azaleas at Bellingrath Plantation Garden, Mobile, Alabama, by Lorelle VanFossen

The azaleas in bloom are spectacular across the south. These are from the Bellingrath Plantation Gardens near Mobile, Alabama.

Scrub flowers like these are hard to photograph. Closeup, the challenge is depth of field. Further back, it’s the clutter. It’s hard to keep the images simple while being interesting to look at.

This flowering azalea image works because it uses the basic rule of thirds, putting a strong visual resting point in one of the crosses of the tic-tac-toe corners of the image.

I took great care to ensure that no bright spots of sunlight or background distractions were in the background, which would pull the eye away from the focal point, especially if they were out of focus. While there is a small sunspot that could have been a distraction in the background, I moved around to let it become part of the background clutter. This is critical when you have a potentially busy subject. Make sure you exclude anything that could be a distraction.

I worked with a medium aperture setting to let the background fall out of focus, but the depth of the foreground grouping of flowers to stay mostly in focus.

For more on background control, see Background Magic and Background Magic Part Two.

Bellingrath Plantation Home, Mobile, Alabama

Bellingrath plantation home, mobile, alabama, by Lorelle VanFossen

I loved visiting the Bellingrath Plantation home and gardens near Mobile, Alabama. They have an amazing art gallery in addition to the beautiful art collection within the unusual house. But the gardens…

The gardens are exquisite no matter what time you are visiting, but they are at their peak in the burst of spring and browns of fall.

I worked hard to find an interesting line that led to the Bellingrath home, and the line of plants and scrubs seemed to point directly at it. There are so many distinctive images of the fairly modern plantation home, I wanted to see if I could come up with something not so postcard.

Patterns in Nature: Spiral Kale

kale ornamental bellingrath garden mobile alabama lorelle vanfossen 2006

We are always on the lookout for fascinating patterns in nature to photograph. This beautiful ornamental kale at the Bellingrath Plantation near Mobile, Alabama, is a wonderful spiral pattern. I positioned the center of the plant in the traditional rule of thirds corner and the whole image popped off the viewfinder in my camera.

Photographing a deep, lacy, and complex patterned plant can be a challenge when it comes to focus points and depth of field. I choose to go with the maximum depth of field to capture as much of the lacy leaves as possible, carefully positioning my camera parallel to the plant, directly over it. Some diffused light from the sky and a careful bouncing of the gold reflector into the center, and I’m very pleased with the results.

More helpful articles on photographing nature, plants, and patterns, see:

Judging Photographs – It’s Now About the Back Story

I’ve been working as a photography judge, reviewer, critic, editor, and even helped teach others how to judge and review photographs, since I was in high school. While there are a lot of points to consider when judging and evaluating a photograph, they basically boil down to:

  • Composition
  • Light
  • Capturing a “moment”
  • Focus
  • Product Quality (film/reproduction quality)

These can be very regimented (only “rule of thirds” compositions allowed) or more subjective. Either way, they are the core foundation for judging a photograph for awards, reproduction, or sale.

The values of how a photograph is judged in the past few years has dramatically changed. Many of these points are not only considered not important, they are not even in the mix when it comes to honoring a photograph.

As I’ve been traveling recently, I’ve talked to a lot of photographers and found they all agree digital photography has revolutionized photography, and they aren’t sure what. Well, I’ve found out why, and it is a little disturbing.

Put a Camera in the Hands of Everyone, and Everyone Takes Pictures

When the Brownie camera was produced, it helped to put a camera in the hands of the common person. A Polaroid not only put a camera in everyone’s hands, it gave them instant gratification with fast picture results. Still, it was novel and the photographs faded quickly, so film cameras made a return boom in the marketplace. Then disposable cameras were in everyone’s hands. Not much later, the digital camera became affordable and now instant photographic gratification can be yours.

With the recent ability to share your photographs with anyone and everyone increased via the Internet, and the fact that most handheld computers and cell phones host built-in cameras, you can take a picture any time and anywhere.

Thus, by putting a camera in the hands of everyone, everyone is taking pictures. The past two or three generations have been the most photographed generations in the history of the world. Every moment of our lives are caught on film. There is a huge glut of photographs everywhere.

Instead of ooing and awwwing over beautiful photographs because they were special, photographs are a dime a thousand dozens. With the myriad photographic images out there, the way we are judging photographs has changed.

It’s About the Back Story

With the glut of photographic images everywhere, taken by anyone, judging a photograph now isn’t always about the technical perfection or expertise. It’s now about the back story.

This is an interesting evolution in judging photographs. I have taught students over the years that a photograph must tell its own story. It needs to stand on its own feet and tell the world what it is about.

Elk snorting during rut, Jasper, Canada, photograph copyright Brent VanFossenEvery element must help to relate the story. An elk in the woods snorting steam out of its nostrils, bellowing out its lust to the world during rut. Because we know it’s rutting season, we know it is the fall. We know it’s cold because of the billowing cloud of mist from the hot breath hitting the cold air. We know it’s early morning because the light is low in the sky, back lighting the steam, and it’s cold. We have a sense of space and time and understanding about the photograph. Yet it is timeless. It doesn’t matter if it was photographed in 1880 or 1980 or 2080. The image surpasses time. It is its own story.

But that isn’t what grabs your attention. It’s the dramatic action caught on film. It’s the power, the composition, the way the light hits the steam, the body position of the elk. All those elements capture your attention and holds it.

A photograph with a back story is different. It isn’t about the light or the composition. It’s about the story that comes with the photograph. And the story is usually summed up with “You should have been there.”.

The photograph doesn’t have a story. The photographer does. “We were walking down the trail and you should have seen the size of that elk snorting smoke out it’s nose.” The photograph doesn’t show the steam, and you can barely see the moose. No thought, no planning, no expertise went into the photograph. It was a snapshot, now published, and in order to understand and appreciate it, you have to hear the story.

With millions of photographs out there, without their photographers standing next to them, people are making up their own back stories to fill in the gaps in the story the photograph tells. If they recognize a landmark, a memory of their own experience at that place may be triggered. If they recognize a situation from the one caught on film, it will trigger a memory of when they were caught in the same situation.

I recently sat through a showing of photographs by people who “should” know what they are doing. As each image came up, I looked at it and buried a groan. The lighting sucked, there were too many distractions, the positioning was all wrong, the horizon line was tilted, or it was out of focus. Pictures I throw away at first glance.

Yet, everyone was so excited and proud of their pictures. And every picture came with a story. The more they talked about their photographs, the more others said, “Oh, me, too!”, “Been there, done that!”, “I remember when that happened to me!”, and “That reminds me of…”. Suddenly everyone had their memories out, using them as filters to judge the photographs.

One woman declared her favorite was a photograph of two kids walking on the beach. “It reminds me of when I was little and we used to go clam digging.”

I looked at the same picture and thought that this was a nice memory. If we were sitting in the privacy of a home browsing through a scrapbook, this wouldn’t be important. But these people are working their way towards serious-make-money photography skills. At that level, this photograph sucked. It was out of focus, the lighting was directly overhead and blinding, with deep shadows under the children’s eyes making them look exhausted, and the waves beyond them were caught between waves rather than one crashing dramatically in the background. Horrible.

The memories triggered blinded this woman to the real technical qualities of the photograph. The back story took over.

Is this right or wrong? It depends.

If you are taking snapshots for your family album, who cares? Only you. Twenty-five or fifty years from now, all you need is a photographic trigger and those memories will come spilling out.

However, if you are publishing, selling, or submitting your images for contests, then a higher standard needs to be met. It should have quality technical, compositional, and artistic merits. Unfortunately, I think a lot of photography judges are letting back stories influence their preferences from the results I’ve seen in the past year or two.

As you consider your own photography, for whatever the end use may be, think about how the photograph can tell its own story without you hovering over it. Think of your photographs as a canvas. You control what goes on and what comes off. Think before you take the photograph. Think about the light, the arrangement of the subjects within the frame, the background, foreground, colors, patterns, choosing horizontal or vertical formats, and all the elements that fit within the frame. Do this before you hit the shutter.

When you photograph consciously rather than randomly and unconsciously, the quality will naturally improve. Pay attention to the details, but most important, let the photograph speak for itself. And let it speak well.

It isn’t about the composition and lighting technique that makes a photograph awesome.

Lens Perspective

Understanding lens perspective is critical to advanced photographic studies and skills. It is the skill of learning how the lens sees. For some, the concept of photography lens perspective is simple. The wider the lens the wider the view, the longer the lens the narrower the view. Yet, lens perspective is much more interesting and important to photographers.

Lens perspective impacts what is captured and “seen” on the film, the amount of foreground and background included, and the working distance between the photographer and the subject.

Lens Perspective – What the Lens See

Wide Angle View of Alaska Mountain Range and water reflection, photography by Brent VanFossenThe wider the lens, the wider the perspective. The longer the lens, the narrower the perspective. This appears to be a pretty basic statement. The more the lens sees, the more goes onto the film. The less the lens sees, the less goes onto the film.

Wide angle lenses see the whole picture. Wide angle lenses range from 50mm to 20mm or smaller, with lenses beyond 20mm, like 17mm, 14mm, and 8mm, as extreme wide angle or fish-eye lens. Wide angle lenses see a wider perspective, showing everything in the viewfinder. This means the photographer must take greater care with what goes into the viewfinder before they press the shutter.

Remember, you are telling a story with your photograph and every character in your story matters. With a wide angle lens, your angle of view includes everything in your landscape, including the garbage can, the signs, telephone poles, mountains, sky, and parked cars. If you want all those in your photograph, then fine, but if you don’t, you need to position yourself so only the subjects that help you tell your photographic story are in the picture.

Mountain Range in Alaska, longer lens zooms in on water reflection - photograph by Brent VanFossenIn contrast, the longer the lens, the narrower the view. Switch to a longer lens and suddenly the garbage cans, signs, poles, sky, and parked cars don’t matter. You’ve narrowed the view to your subject, leaving out all the extraneous detail. In other words, you’ve zoomed in on the subject and now what was just a part of the overall scene is the focal point of the photograph.

Longer lenses are anything longer than 50mm such as 100mm, 200mm, 400mm, etc.

A 50mm lens, however, is considered a “normal” lens, not just because it used to “normally” come on any camera body purchase, but because it is closes to what the eye sees “normally”, which is about 55mm. If you want to photography, literally, what you see, then stick as close to a 50mm lens (35-70mm range) to capture your eye view.

Lens Perspective: Magnification

Graphic chart of lens persepctiveThere are reasons other than magnification to choose a particular lens. One of the most important of these reasons is the change of perspective afforded by using lenses of different focal lengths.

A wide angle lens sees a wide angle of view. The first thing people think of is that a wide angle lens will let them include more of a scene in the image, and this is true. What they don’t consider, however, is what the short focal length will do to the appearance of the subject.

If you were to make a head and shoulders portrait of your best friend using a 20mm lens, you would have to stand a distance of about a foot (30 cm) away from him. At this distance, his nose would be much closer to the lens than his ears, and so the nose would be much bigger proportionally than the ears in the photograph. This is generally not a flattering effect, and so we don’t use wide angle lenses to photograph closeups of people.

Magnify with Lenses
(Lens magnification as the photographer doesn’t move – only the lenses are changed.)
lensmag20.jpg
20mm
lensmag55.jpg
55mm
lensmag200.jpg
200mm
lensmag300.jpg
300mm
lensmagn500.jpg
500mm

Alpine Wild Flowers, photograph by Brent VanFossenThe same effect happens when we photograph flowers closeup with a wide angle lens. The parts of the flower that are closer to the lens appear proportionally bigger in the resulting photograph than the other parts of the flower, or than the other flowers in the picture. A wide angle lens will cause objects closer to the lens to appear proportionally larger in the photograph than the other objects in the picture. This is useful for separating an object from surrounding objects, making the objects appear farther apart. Wide angle lenses seem to expand space.

Telephoto lenses magnify objects. More than this, however, they affect the appearance of objects in a photograph. Using a 100mm lens to make the same head and shoulders portrait of your friend as you made with the 20mm lens, you would have to stand back about 10 feet (3 or 4 meters). At this distance, the nose and ears are all approximately the same distance from the lens, so there is no apparent distortion of perspective. The person will appear as we expect him to appear, because we’re used to seeing people from across a room. We don’t usually see people from extremely close up, and so the view from the 20mm lens seems strange to us. If there are other people in the picture, they will also appear normal.

Clarks Nutcracker - the bird behind is compressed to appear closer than it actually was, photograph by Brent VanFossenIf we move to a very long telephoto lens, like a 500mm or 600mm lens, we would have to move backward 25 or 30 feet (10 meters) to photograph our friend. The magnification power of this lens is high. A person standing a few feet behind him would appear to be nearly at his side, because the difference of a few feet compared to 30 is small. The large telephoto lens has a perspective that seems to compress space, magnifying distant objects equally.

We can use this difference in perspective between lenses to our advantage. Any time we want to separate a foreground element from a background, we can use a wide angle lens. Any time we want two objects to appear close together, we can use a long telephoto.

Lens Perspective: Control of Background

The background is an important part of any photograph. A wide angle lens has a wide angle of view. That means that it will include a large amount of background behind the subject. Everything, from the mountains to the trees to the parking lot with all the cars can appear in the background of a wide angle photograph. A telephoto lens, however, has a narrow angle of view. That means that it sees a smaller amount of background behind a subject. By using a telephoto lens, we can choose the part of the background that we want behind our subject, excluding everything else. For this very reason, a 200mm lens is a much more useful lens for closeup work than the more common 50mm lens. A 500mm lens is much more useful for wildlife photography than a 200mm lens for a number of reasons, but one of the most overlooked is its ability to control the background. Control of the background is essential to good photography.

200mm lens and marmotPhotography turns a three dimensional world into a flat one dimensional image. Depending upon the lens perspective, the combination of optics and focal lengths you are using, the aperture, and the distance to your subject and to the background, things in the distance can suddenly become very close when flattened into a photograph. This is usually the cause of the tree growing out of the head, when the tree is meters away in the background but the photograph is compressed so the branches look like they are growing right out of the skull.

Lens perspective is the view of the scene, including the background, that is captured onto the film through the lens. A wide angle lens sees a wider angle of view, therefore it captures a wider perspective. A long telephoto lens sees a very narrow view, therefore it captures a narrow perspective. In these three photographs of a marmot in the Olympic National Park, we kept our subject, the cooperative marmot, basically the same size in the frame. 300mm lens and marmotWe’ve moved either further or closer to our subject and changed the focal length of the lens to change our background, since different focal lengths change the background perspective behind the subject. Across the valley, more than a mile away, rose a mountain with the last of the winter’s patches of snow on its steep sides. A 200mm lens, the shortest lens used in this series of photos, sees a lot of the background. You can see the snow on the far mountain, though it’s not clear if the white blobs are snow, clouds, or cartoon thoughts coming from the marmot.

500mm lens and marmotBrent changed to a 300mm lens and moved farther back from the marmot to keep him about the same size in the frame. The 300mm lens sees a bit narrower perspective than the 200mm, so the white snow is just a blurry bit in the corner. Moving even further back, Brent changed to a 500mm lens with its very narrow perspective and the white snow packs are gone and the marmot is isolated against a green background.

Using this technique and understanding how the lens “sees” and change the background perspective, you can isolate your subject against a more interesting or appropriate background by simply changing lenses. This opens up your options on background composition.

 
Another Background and Lens Perspective Example

Thistles using a 55mm and wide background perspectivethistles using a 200mm lens and narrow background perspectiveIn this example, we set up a dried teasal in the backyard.

A wider angle lens like a 55mm requires a close working distance to photograph the subject and, as it sees a wider perspective, captures a lot of background. We see the out-of-focus parking lot and buildings in behind as well as the green grass.

By moving backward from the subject, keeping it the same size in our viewfinder and not changing the exposure, we increase the magnification by using a longer lens such as a 200mm. Longer lenses narrow their view so you see a narrower perspective of the background.

Now, only the green grass in the background is visible, isolating the subject against a neutral and undistracting background. Using a longer lens can help you to choose your background.

Working Distance

Which Lens Took This Picture?

A photograph of tree bark. Can you guess which lens took this picture?
Either lens could have produced this image. The difference is in the working distance.
A 55mm lens needs less distance from the subject to get the same picture.
A 55mm lens requires a much closer working distance to get the exact same image.
A 200mm lens needs more distance from the subject to get the same picture.
A 200mm lens requires a greater working distance to reproduce the same image.

For most subjects in nature, the distance your camera is from the subject won’t influence the subject. But photographing insects, butterflies and such, can be difficult because they are exceptionally attentive to your location and will respond accordingly – often by escaping the situation. Being able to get close and still maintain some distance becomes critical then. Add to this the challenge of low light, and the closer you are to the subject, the greater the chance of casting a shadow.

By using longer lenses, your distance from the subject and the camera increases. This is called the working distance. Working with live creatures, this distance is critical. Either way, it’s nice to have some room between the camera lens and the subject. Here are some examples of working distance based on the closest focusing distances of typical lenses.

Lens 300mm 200mm 100mm 50mm
Closest Focusing Distance 138″ 84″ 42″ 18″

Using a longer lens, you can maintain the subject at the same size but increase the “working distance” between you and the subject. For body heat sensitive nature subjects like spiders and spider webs, maintaining distance is critical. The same stradegy applies when photographing grizzly bears and other large and potentially dangerous creatures. The greater the working distance the safer you may be.

The greater your magnification is ehanced through the use of extension tubes and teleconveters, the more your working distance is cut. You must move closer to your subject to find the focus point.

Play around with the lens equipment you have and see how your lens sees depending upon how far you are from your subject and how big your subject is in your frame across the range of lenses. Make notes and work with the various lenses to learn how they see, so when you are out in the field, you will know automatically which lens to pick for which subject matter and working distance.

For more information on controlling the background of your subject with lens perspective, see our articles on Background Magic, Specific Crimes of Ignoring the Background in Photography, and Behind the Scenes of Background Magic.

The Art of the Door

red wooden door, Spain, photograph by Brent VanFossenThere is “something” about a door. Growing up in Washington State, it was a summer and winter ritual of ours to stop along the way, crossing over the mountains to Eastern Washington to visit friends and family, at The Alps. The Alps was owned by a German immigrant family and they offered a rest stop for fun, candy, and toys. Originally a small part of their home, it has now grown into quite the complex, but in those early days, it was a magical place for children.

Alongside the highway, the home hung over the embankment and down to the river below. We’d climb down the narrow stairs to the grassy yard alongside the river turned into a small park-like setting. Old wooden decorated door on abandoned building, Tel Aviv, Israel, photograph by Brent VanFossenThere were chairs to rest upon and chairs swinging under trees. A small playground and sandbox was for the smaller children. And there, in the middle of it all near the river, stood a framed door. Just a door. Nothing special, just a simple wooden door. It was weathered and slightly bowed from years of exposure to the harsh Cascade Mountain weather, paint peeling slightly, and a handle waiting to be turned.

I could look around the door. I could see everything beyond the door. But the door itself begged to be opened and passed through. You are supposed to open doors and walk through them. My mother never told us we weren’t supposed to walk through walls, but after a few experiments, you understand the logic of her lack of explanation. You understood clearly that to get beyond the wall, you had to use the door. Even though this door had no walls, the compulsion to use it was fierce. It “begged” to be used. It said, “Open me.”

Our language often uses windows as a reference to openings and gateways. “Eyes are the windows of the soul.” In reality, it is the doors that get you where you are going.

Traveling is not just seeing the new; it is also leaving behind. Not just opening doors; also closing them behind you, never to return. But the place you have left forever is always there for you to see whenever you shut your eyes.
Jan Myrdal, The Silk Road

Exploring Doors

Old door in ancient building, Rhodos, Greece, photograph by Brent VanFossenDuring our travels, our fascination with doors has continued. Now, Brent is obsessed. We prowl around ancient cities and the derelict remains of new ones, looking for patterns, textures, and designs in doors that graphically call to us to photograph.

Tiny narrow wooden doorway, Rhodos, Greece, photograph by Brent VanFossenDoors come in a wide variety of shapes and sizes. In the United States, doors come in glass and wood and combinations of the two, and they are inevitably the same size and grouped as one or two doors side by side.

Leave the comfort of door standardization in the US behind and you find a world where doors are added when needed, and sometimes as an afterthought. They are huge and intimidating, covered with threatening bolts and braces, and small and informal, allowing someone to just barely wedge through. Some doors are not so much for access as they are for letting light and air into and through the building. Some doors have signs, graphics, pictures, carvings, and amazing details in lines, shapes, and patterns, while others are quiet, simple wooden boards to block access and light.

Copper covered doorway held together temporarily, Old Tel Aviv, Israel, photograph by Brent VanFossenNot all buildings are made of wood. Some are made from adobe style baked mud and sand and others from cements and different stone. The doors within their walls can be as sturdy or weak as their supporting construction. They can be painted to blend in or stand out against its surroundings.

Arab door way with tile mosaics, Budapest, photograph by Brent VanFossenDoors can often give you a glimpse at the work or culture that lie beyond, such as huge barricades outside of embassies and government buildings, or the rounded or dome-like arches over doors covered with thousands of tiny tile mosaics in Arab or Muslim communities.

Some doors look more like fortresses, determined to keep the “outsiders” out and the “insiders” in, possibly left over from ancient times when their towns and cities were under seige. In some ancient European towns, especially along the rivers and seas, the town grew to be designed around self protection from attackers, with walls and curving, maze-like streets. Cottage style door with small opening over the door, Rhodos, Greece, photograph by Brent VanFossenDoors into homes were kept small with long hallways with more doors between the street and the living space. It’s hard for a warrior covered in armor and weapons to get through these narrow openings. Some doors and gateways even hosted openings above where residents would pour hot water or boiling oil down upon the heads of the attackers trying to break down the doors.

Doors provide security and protection from more than just other humans. They can also stop bugs, weather, and give a little privacy to the lives inside.

Door to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, Jerusalem, Israel, photograph by Lorelle VanFossenSome doors are famous, especially those found on churches. In Jerusalem, the door of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre is ancient. It is worn by the hands that touch it on their way to and from the ancient church complex, visiting the spot where many believe Christ was crucified. The door is very tall, almost a story high, and built of heavy thick wood, covered with a cross hatch of beveled squares carved into it. The handle and lock area are coverd with the greasy fingermarks of the thousands of hands that have opened and closed the door. Alongside the door is a marble column, where millions of pilgrims and visitors touch or kiss the broken cracks in the column before entering and exiting the church as part of their ritual blessing. The door is part of the history and continuity of the church.

Grafiti covered door in an abandoned building, Paris, France, photograph by Brent VanFossenDoors are also art forms. We have found doors of abandoned buildings used for graphiti and others of wealthier buildings with doors hand tooled and carved, covered with copper, silver, and artwork that speaks of a time when people cared about how their buildings and doors looked. Handcraftsmanship for door building still exists, though it is hard to find. The speedy and cheap methods of manufacturing doors and windows have taken much of the “style” out of doors. So finding an artistic door makes the find even more of a treasure, worthy of photographing and preserving.

Happiness is something that comes into our lives through doors we don’t even remember leaving open.
Rose Lane
 

Photographing Doors

Photographing a door seems like an easy task. After all, the surface is generally flat, so you don’t have to worry about the film plane or depth of field. Ah, but that’s the challenge of photography. Even the easy photographic subjects can become complicated.

Shadows of nearby trees play across adobe walls and blue door, Santa Fe, New Mexico, photograph by Brent VanFossenDoors tend to avoid the sun. They like to sit under awnings and within doorways, usually where the shadows play. If you want the graphic elements of the shadows across the door, then this can work for you. If you don’t, you may have to return during a time and weather that will allow softer light direction and no shadows, or compose around the shadow lines.

A door in the shade tends to be in low, blue toned light, giving it a cold tone, so the use of a warming filter can counter the blue tones, warming them up – unless the cool, blue tone works with the door’s tone and design.

Late afternoon casts shadows which add to the red and grey bright colors of this door, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada, photograph by Brent VanFossenAs with nature, early morning and late afternoon is the best time for many doors as the light level is warm and low enough in the horizon to duck under porches, eves, and awnings for front lighting. When found as side lighting, it can enhance the texture of the door and its knockers and knobs.

The red paint framed door here was captured in the late afternoon warmth of the sunset in Prince George, British Columbia, Canada. The side light added a deep shadow to the door, accentuating the contrasting colors of the red and warming the gray walls. The geometry of the door and colors is felt as the shadow adds depth to the shape. The red railing echos the squares and rectangles of the door, adding pattern upon pattern in the details.

In general, you will encounter medium to slow shutter speeds, so a tripod is usually essential to capture the details in the grain, texture, and patterns. A flash for fill might be needed, but rarely. Usually the ambient light is adequate unless you are hand holding.

When one door closes another door opens; but we often look so long and so regretfully upon the closed door that we do not see the ones which open for us.
Alexander Graham Bell (1847-1922) – American inventor

A blue hexagon painted on an old door in an abandoned building, Tel Aviv, Israel, photograph by Brent VanFossenWhen you encounter a photographic door, remember your first impression. What was it about the door or doorway that first caught your attention. Was it the overall scene of the door, the wall around the door, the door itself, a window or knob on the door, or maybe the texture of the door. Whatever first caught your eye, begin by pointing your camera there.

Brent and a photography friend spent an early morning prowling the old city area of Tel Aviv, Israel, known as Neve Tsedek. Now filled with old broken down remains of ancient buildings, it is slowly reviving itself as an artist community. A door falling apart caught their eye. Someone had painted a blue hexagon echoing the upper door’s design, a last ditch effort to pretty the door. The remnants of blue paint contrasted with the peeling and weathered wood, exposed to the sun and nearby sea breeze for many years. Filling the frame with the blue painted area and the contrasting broken lower panel, the story is told without seeing the rest of the door or building. We feel the last breath of life slowly leaving the body of the entire building through the door.

Allow the door’s main focal point to fill the frame. Move in close enough to remove all distractions and isolate the element that caught your eye. Watch the lighting and keep the back of the camera parallel to the door to maximize the depth of field. Take your time. Unlike photographing wildlife, usually the door isn’t going anywhere soon.

Ancient large metal hinge is contrast to the weathered wood of the door and wall, Dawson Creek, British Columbia, Canada, photograph by Brent VanFossenIf the texture of the door is what fascinates you, the peeling paint, the carvings, metal grating, some closeup aspect, move in close and consider using a macro or closeup lens to fill the frame with the details. Peeling paint and deep carving can be accentuated with nice side lighting, using the shadows to add depth to the texture.

Door handle on red wood door, Paris, photograph by Brent VanFossenDoor knobs can be very interesting subjects. Depth of field offers some photographic choices, too. If the end of the knob is your subject, either increase the depth of field with a smaller aperture to capture the background of the knob, or use a larger aperture to allow the background beyond the end of the knob to blur out of focus. Watch for highlights, keyholes, and distracting element in the background of the door knob end which may pull the viewer’s eye away from the subject.

Keyholes can make for interesting frames if the subject beyond is worthy of such framing. Like the door knob, you have a choice in your depth of field options to allow the keyhole to be blurred and out-of-focus but recognizable as a “keyhole frame” of the subject seen through the keyhole, or increase your depth of field to allow the keyhole and view beyond to be in focus. A wide angle lens with a very small aperture will increase your depth of field and allow a greater range to be in focus, possibly allowing the keyhole and view beyond to be sharp.

The texture of the cement and spackled wall leads the eye to the door, Rhodos, Greece, photograph by Brent VanFossenWhen you have photographed the item that caught your attention on or around the door, move back and study the rest of the door. Is there more to photograph? Change your position, closer or farther from the door, but also bend down low and photograph knobs and other door objects at its “eye level”. Look around and see if there is a step or doorway across from the door to allow you a “looking down” angle of view for another perspective. Before leaving a door, make sure you have captured a variety of perspectives so you will have choices when viewed later as to which look is the best one.

Using a wide angle lens, the texture of the cement and spackled wall is enhanced and the door plays a smaller role, Rhodos, Greece, photograph by Brent VanFossenThese two photographs were taken in Rhodos, Greece. The texture of the cement, spackle and paint with the unrailed stairs leading to the door offered a wonderful “door landscape” effect. Using a medium length lens, Brent was able to isolate part of the wall leading along with the stairs to the door in a strong vertical. Stepping back, he realized the story was in the stairs’ jagged pattern against the contrasting “jagged” effect of the wall. He changed to a wide angle lens, put the camera on the horizontal, and captured the landscape effect of the patterns, and the door became a detail the eye is led to, but the textures and patterns hold the interest.

When one door is shut, another opens.
Miguel de Cervantes

Cabin porch and door, Buffalo River mountain area, Arkansas, photograph by Brent VanFossenThere is a timeless quality to doors. Among all these pictures of doors, do you know the season or year of the photograph? Do you know the age or time period of the door? While you might recognize an architectural reference, attributing the door’s construction to a specific historical time period, it could be a reproduction or the original door. With such timeless subjects, photographs of doors are great additions to your photography inventory.

And always look for the symbolism in the door and find ways to “open a new door” to your audience and clients. Doors are part of our history and our lifestyle. Let’s celebrate doors.